Higher learning providers throughout the globe have begun to seek ways to incorporate eco-friendly properties into current structural components of their campuses. A green building integrates practices and materials designed to reduce resource consumption during the entire lifecycle of use. Various products are applicable after a building has been constructed to improve sustainability and achieve a desired amount of environmental responsibility. Photoluminescent university egress exits are simple to implement and a cost effective option for any campus. Every school is required by law to have items in place for proper egress identification. It has been common for structures to have incandescent lighted exit signs combined with plain metal identifiers; however, these options do not help the environment.
Green building changes do not have to be extensive to support eco-friendliness and resource preservation. A small transformation from electrically powered signs reduces the carbon footprint of a campus. Self-luminous egress components allow a university to implement greener practices without making significant building alterations or investing a large amount of money. Zero-energy products contribute to eco-friendliness by:
- Limiting Materials
- Avoiding Toxic Resources
- Eliminating Electrical Needs
- Including Completely Recyclable Resources
- Extending Durability
- Reducing Installation and Maintenance Requirements
Universities seeking an affordable way to begin altering structures for green objectives, have self-luminous identifiers as an option. The decision to switch out incandescent exit signs with these energy efficient choices delivers hundreds to thousands of dollars in savings. Reduced electrical consumption limits the carbon footprint of every structure by removing the use of a non-renewable resource.
Zero-Energy Identifiers Provide Additional Environmental Benefits
While energy savings are the most obvious advantage provided by this building safety code compliant item, self-luminous choices supply additional perks upon their implementation. The materials used to make these products are often toxic, non-degradable, and contribute to landfills. Glow-in-the-dark alternatives consist of completely recyclable materials and prevent the need to continuously use non-renewal resources. They are not added to landfills, do not pose health risks, or emit toxic chemicals into the environment. Incandescent choices require an extensive amount of materials to be installed at each point within a structure. Every sign needs to be wired to the main power source in addition to a backup generator. Both increase the installation expenses of compliance by incandescent means.
The maintenance costs are also higher with alternative signing options because each installed item must be tested, have wiring maintained, and receive bulb changes. Each of these tasks increases the amount of materials required throughout product usage and the cost of having them ready for an emergency. Generator maintenance is another concern as a university weighs these two choices. Photoluminescent products conserve resources and help higher learning centers save money. Universities desiring to include eco-friendly practices have self-luminous as an available code compliant option. Self-luminous safety components do not entail the failure points of their incandescent alternatives. A failed generator or main power source will not phase these items when an evacuation is necessary. Photoluminescent university egress exits allow schools to incorporate green initiatives, reduce costs, and provide a safer environment to every person entering their campus.