Placement of reliable egress signing within a building is important for ensuring a quick evacuation as an emergency takes place. Identifiers made with Tritium became popular as owners began seeking a non-energy alternative to incandescent illumination. While a definite cost saver for meeting continual usage needs, the choice introduces the drawback of having radioactive particles within a building. A variety of Tritium exit sign alternatives exist today, but the most promising development has been the introduction of photoluminescent egress products. This particular choice eliminates numerous drawbacks associated directly with Tritium products and helps owners remove the need for energy to remain compliant. Each has been approved for building safety; however, only one meets the necessary energy reduction, dependability, and simplicity owners need to make compliance a breeze.
What Differences Exist Between Each Type of Egress Identification?
Tritium identifiers are one of the most costly exit route identification options due to their special handling requirements. The addition of radioactive particles causes purchasing, maintenance, and disposal expenses to be higher than any other form of egress identification. An incandescent sign is more affordable to acquire, but has an increased continued care expense. Incandescent components must be wired to two power sources by a professional, require extensive upkeep, and involve continuous energy expenses. LED products are a Tritium exit sign alternative designed to use a small fraction of the energy required by incandescent choices. Both have a comparable purchasing cost; however, LED technology offers reduced upkeep and power usage benefits over incandescent products. Building owners are choosing to step away from electrically powered options completely in order to reduce energy costs. Tritium and photoluminescent components are currently the most prominent self-powered options. Photoluminescent products are a suitable Tritium exit sign alternative since they do not use radioactive materials to generate light.
Choosing the Path of Photoluminescence Has Its Perks
Photoluminescent technology is transforming the egress safety industry by allowing owners to eliminate electrical costs, maintenance requirements, and harmful landfill dumping. This Tritium exit sign alternative is the most environmentally conscious choice for owners who want to take a greener approach while managing associated compliance expenses. Electrically powered signs require bulb changes, wiring maintenance, and have a higher disposal cost when replacement becomes necessary. Tritium removes the electrical usage concerns: however, the maintenance and disposal restrictions are immense due to the radioactive materials housed in the tubes for light generation. Photoluminescent technology provides a reliable alternative that does not require any type of radioactive or electrical process to provide illumination. This self-luminous signing option also supplies these benefits:
- Easy Setup
- Elimination of Toxic Materials
- Do Not Require Wiring
- Minimal Maintenance
- Extended Duration of Life
- Safer for the Environment
- 100% Recyclable
While a little more expensive to purchase than electrically powered alternatives, photoluminescent products have a lower overall expense than nuclear-based signs. A photoluminescent identifier consists of a metal or plastic substrate with a film coating and has an average lifespan of twenty-five years. This signing evolution allows owners to reduce compliance expenditures, provide reliable visual aids, and practice sustainability within each of their buildings.